Answering your reviewer

13417396454_e70537e461_z

My toughest photo critic, by Matthew, Attribution License

When your work is examined, it is usual you to need to make amendments. In this respect your thesis examination is similar to the peer review that happens when you submit work to journals. You will need to respond to all the requests for changes, both by making changes and by writing a letter that explains what you have done.

In this article, David Cook provides some really helpful advice about what to write in your response letter and how to interpret the sort of comments your reviewer might make.

A really important points he makes is that the reviewer is always right. Even if you don’t thinks so, their comments usually mean something is not clear or is missing from your document that has lead them to the wrong conclusion. Whatever it is, you must fix it. That often means thinking carefully about what the reviewer has said as it might not be obvious to you right away. It sometimes takes me a few days before I “get” their point of view.

Check out Tip 10, 11 and Table 3 in particular.
Cook, D. A. (2016). Twelve tips for getting your manuscript published. Medical Teacher, 38(1), 41-50. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1074989 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1074989

Advertisements

One thought on “Answering your reviewer

  1. Pingback: 2016 posting roundup | MVM learning

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s